Tuesday, November 1, 2016

The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction Nov/Dec 2016 Issue



A few days ago, I made this cryptic post on Facebook that I had placed in some sort of contest. I didn't want to say anything because I wasn't 100% sure the magazine had been released yet, but I can see that it is up on Amazon and we are now into the cover month. So, the rest of the story...
Back in early summer, The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction held a contest for readers to update a single sentence of a classic SF novel. Contestants could send in as many as six entries. I sent only two, because...well, let's just say it had nothing to do with confidence. Last week, I received a package from Publisher Gordon VanGelder. When I read the letter, my hand went to my mouth and trembled. F&SF is one of the most prestigious magazines in the field. And to see something I had written within its pages has been my dream for more than thirty years. Thank you Mr. Van Gelder and everyone at F&SF.

Saturday, July 16, 2016

REVIEWS - Ghostbusters (2016) and Netflix: Strange Things


Here are a couple of reviews for you.  Mild spoilers.

NETFLIX: STRANGER THINGS

Season 1, Episode 1

Wynona Ryder as Joyce. Photo: NETFLIX
          The first episode of Netflix's new series STRANGER THINGS is Eh, okay so far.  Thirty minutes in, I wasn't yet convinced to watch episode two, but by the end I was curious as to what would happen next.
          WHAT'S NEW:  Not a lot, yet.
          WHAT'S NOT NEW:  Small, isolated town with a morally questionable sheriff.  Mom (Wynona Ryder) who is overworked, over stressed, and raising her sons alone. Dad is out of the picture and might be anywhere with any number of girlfriends. Ryder's younger son is abducted by what may or may not be a supernatural evil created in the lab.
          Part of that evil (possibly) is a girl who is around the same age as the four boys on whom the show focuses.  An X-FILES-style secret lab sends out forces to track her down. She obviously originated in the lab and seems to have been part of or birthed by a huge Mordor-ish tree-trunk-looking-thing, growing out of the wall, sporting short tentacles and a clickety-smacky kind of maw.
          WHAT I LIKED:  Story is set in the 1980s, and since I am a child of that era, the show sparks a lot of nostalgia for me.  The music--even the background music that sets the mood--sounds like the synthesizer horror-movie riffs you'd hear in a John Carpenter flick from the '80s. That's a nice, subtle touch.  Spoiler here, but I gotta tell ya:  In one scene, Ryder shows her son that she bought tickets for them to watch a movie.  The movie is POLTERGEIST.  I think it would have been funny--cheesy, but funny--if the movie had been BEETLEJUICE.  (Even though we're six years too early for that one.)
          PREDICTIONS:  I have not watched episode two yet, but . . . .  Ryder's son most likely has been pulled to The Other Side (whatever its name will be).  Hence the POLTERGEIST reference. He will act as liaison between the human realm and that of the monster(s) always under great risk of losing his innocence and becoming one of Them.  The three other boys (his friends) will form a sort of Hardy Boys/Stand By Me kind of club to search for their abducted friend--a mystery that will last at least the entire season.  The club will always be closer to the truth than are the adults and especially the police.  The only adult the boys will trust will be some sort of Mentor, a grandfather- or uncle-type, who sends them on missions (probably secondary missions that aid in the main goal) but cannot participate beyond sage advice and will be unreachable when they most need him. The escapee girl, who we are not yet sure about, will probably be an on again/off again ally with whom we must work to build our trust while she does the same towards those around her.
          Wynona Ryder will always be worried and weepy.


~   ~   ~

GHOSTBUSTERS (2016)


Ecto-1, Tulsa, OK convention. Photo: Sam Reeves
           Part of me thinks the movie is overhyped, part thinks that the movie is smart but not brilliant.
          I mean, let's face it, the comedy in the first half of the movie rarely ascends above fart jokes. 
          When I first heard about the GHOSTBUSTERS reboot and saw that they were all women, I thought that this was another unfortunate bastard of political correctness.  The less sexist part of me said, "Stop wondering how they eat and breathe and other science facts.  It's GHOSTBUSTERS, not Shakespeare."  Besides, nobody said four guys were the perfect match for this story.
          One of the main reasons I wanted to watch the movie was Melissa McCarthy.  I have loved everything I have seen from her.  She is naturally hilarious, seems affable, gorgeous, and umpteen million other adjectives that boil down to just plain awesome.
          She didn't stand out in this movie.  I mean, she's good, but I felt that her character never really got off the ground in the explosive way a person might expect from a fantasy, special-effects driven movie. Then again, she is trying to recreate and renew the slot of Peter Venkman's character.  Bill Murray is pretty hard to outshine.  And maybe that is McCarthy just being smart.  If she had done something totally new and alien, we might have been put off.
          Leslie Jones is Patty Tolan, who represents (is that the right word?) Winston (originally played by Ernie Hudson). I liked her from her first second on screen. She is snarky and brilliant without falling into the Angry Woman stereotype. Patty knows the history of the city in what seems like a School of Hard Knocks versus Ivy League College educated way. The only thing I found incongruent with her is that she is obviously a history buff, yet she had never heard of ley lines. I mean, I have no history expertise (most of what I know about the US Constitution, I learned from the old School House Rock song) but even I know what ley lines are.  Maybe I am just nitpicking there though. 
          Kate McKinnon might be my favorite of the bunch. She is Jillian Holtzmann, or Egon, if we are going to keep comparing.  McKinnon's version, however, is probably the more original.  Her look with the blonde pompadour is more like the Egon from The Real Ghostbusters cartoon than it was Harold Ramis. She is a loveable rogue (the woman can't keep from propping her feet up onto the furniture) but she is not an intentional charmer.  She is goofy without being bumbling.  She is having fun with every second. 
          Holtzmann loses credibility for me because of the speed in which she creates impossibly theoretical, nuclear-physics kind of equipment.  The Ghostbusters are barely more than leaving one scene, when Holtzmann is already presenting them with the next phase of the invention they just used.
          CONS:  What the hell is it with that whirlygig-looking thing that Abby (McCarthy) keeps using to detect ghosts?  I mean, we've all seen sixty or seventy seasons of the Syfy Channel's GHOST HUNTERS.  We know what KVM and EMF meters look like.  It's not a kid's night light toy that can also cool you off during a ball game.  

Sam Reeves with Ghost Hunter founder Jason Hawes. Photo by Tonya Reeves

          PROS:  The first half of the movie was the new crew trying to terraform a VERY familiar country.  Rebuilding an iconic world is no easy chore.  They did a pretty good job of it, though.  While this movie may not be as immortal as the Summer 1984 blockbuster, it will be one of the best movies of this year.  Once the contemporary version made it past the midpoint, they started mixing in the new with the old.  It no longer felt completely like a reboot and more like a different flavor of the same story. 
            The special effects were not just cool, they were beautiful.

          There were a few hilarious moments.  Plenty of cute cameos.  And my wife and son roared with laughter throughout.

          Reboots have an inherent handicap:  they must recreate (and outdo) the magic of the original.  The originals became iconic because they expanded the borders of what we knew.  STAR WARS took an old story and gave us visuals that rewrote the books for the special effects industry.  One of the most significant reasons the original GHOSTBUSTERS succeeded was that it gave us a ghost story without the nightmares.  Changing the genders of the main characters was a good start, but it shouldn't have stopped there.

       

           

         

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

People Watching, People Bouncing


          I must tell you of my recent adventure:  I am 45 years old, and for the first time in my life, I went to a public swimming pool.  My doctor said that exercising in the pool would be great for my back, especially since the buoyancy would take pressure off my disks. 
          Boy was she right!  I had difficulty with balance at first, but it only took a few minutes to find my sea legs.   I haven't swam in probably fifteen years, and for the first time in thirteen years, I had no pain from the small of my back down to my feet.  None!  I mean, it relieved pain I had grown so accustomed to that I was no longer aware of its presence until it was gone. 
          I stayed in for about thirty minutes.  It was great.  But there was one big problem. Every 45 minutes, everyone on a ladder chair blows whistles so the lifeguards can go take a break in the air conditioning.  Those whistles mean that everyone has to get out of the pool. I began to climb out.  I was all right until I once again felt the full force of gravity. 
          Instantly, I got sick.  I mean hand-over-my-mouth-so-I-don't-puke sick.
          I sat on the first bench I could find, and I was not able to get up for about another thirty minutes.  It made me so sick that I could not make myself go back into the water, even after the nausea passed.
          Why did this happen?  Had I overexerted myself without knowing it?  Did I maybe get water into my middle ear and throw my equilibrium out of whack? 
          Being benched was okay, though, because it allows me to people watch.  The world is full of fantastic characters that might one day make it into a story.  Or bits and pieces of several people might merge into one good character.
          So, I sat on the bench and people watched.  I couldn't hear the conversations because of the fountains in the pool splashing.  I did make the following observations, though:
          There were more teenagers in the kiddie pool than there were kids.
          The cadre of We Studmuffins Three kept circling the pool.  They all looked like they had been wet at some point, but I never actually saw them get into the water.  The one who strutted with the greatest amount of I-passed-the-driver's exam machismo seemed to be the leader. The two wingmen, the lesser muffins, walked a half step behind him.  They all wore similar (but not matching, matching ain't cool) black swimming trunks.  Their hair was all dark brown and cut in the same styles.  Each had pecks that shouted, "Look! Secondary hormones have kicked in!" They walked with their arms slightly flexed and their asses cocked as if they had hemorrhoids the size of a hedgehog colony.
          There was a hipster with a chest-length red beard. It looked like someone had tried to roll some dreadlocks with it but changed their mind.  I liked him.  He had character potential.  He was impressed with my horse-fly-killing ability. (Open-handed slap--Oppa, Miyagi Style!)  He said, "Dude, I'd rather get stung by a wasp than one of those things."
          My favorite was the elderly couple, though. They were probably in their seventies, both wearing floppy straw hats.  Both were a good forty pounds overweight. These old folks were the only ones of their age there, and I guess they were not satisfied sitting at the edge dangling their tootsies.  The woman slowly crept down the ladder first, followed closely by her husband.  She walked with her arms gliding at the surface of the water, as if she were using an invisible walker.  They left the 4 ft section and trudged like pilgrims fighting the elements to the rope with blue and white floats that marked the center of the pool and the 5 ft section.  The man stood with his back to the rope.  Occasionally, he stretched his arms out to his sides, airplane-like, but not very often.  Otherwise, he did not move.  He just stood there, looking put out. 
          All of a sudden, I noticed that the woman was bouncing.  Hands folded over her belly and hopping.  She kept doing this, and apparently she was not having fun.  She neither laughed nor even smiled.  The husband appeared oblivious, even though she was three feet away.  Maybe he was used to it. 
          Five minutes passed and she was still hopping.  Completely expressionless.  Just boing. Boing. Boing. Boing.
          Ten minutes passed. 
          I'm pretty sure she bounced the entire 45 minutes between lifeguard breaks.  How did she do that without having a heart attack?  And why wasn't she having fun?

Sunday, July 10, 2016

When Dad Didn't Turn 85


Samuel H. Reeves, Sr
July 10, 1929 - February 18, 2010



Just before 1 AM, hours before I went to bed, I looked at the date and remembered what today was. I found a picture of him and posted it to a few social media sites so I could say, “Happy birthday, Dad.”  Now, after I have had some sleep, I wonder whether I was doing that for attention.

It’s odd that every few minutes or so, I stop thinking about him.  I actually forget that it has been six years. Then, there are the other times....

I usually make several trips to the bathroom on this day. Not because I drank too much water. I’m hiding so my wife and son don’t have to see me randomly stop moving for minutes at a time, because I have been buffeted with a new and concentrated form of paralysis that makes me re-live, “I think we just lost Dad.”

I guess there is a reason I posted this too. I don’t know why yet, though. If I am going to be audacious enough to call myself a writer, then I know at least that our heads are less useful for figuring things out than is a blank page.

Thursday, June 30, 2016

Chuck Palahniuk - Fight Club 2 Comics

My wife typically exceeds her recommended daily allowance of being awesome.  In a recent visit to a comic book store, she held up Fight Club 2 #2 and said, "Do you have this?"

I said, "Yes, but I don't have any of the others."

Five minutes later, she handed me the stack in the video below and said, "You're done now, right?"





Friday, January 1, 2016

Year End Catch Up

Life in General...

I've been away for a few months. My only excuse is mind-boggling laziness.  A LOT has happened, especially recently, so bear with this lonnnng post while I catch you up, and then talk about my New Year's Resolution . . . er, Self-Challenge rather.

In the middle of October, someone hacked into our bank account and stole what money we needed to survive the rest of the month. In fact, we would not be able to pay our electric bill. To our great relief, the money was returned a few days later, when the bank verified the charges were fraudulent, and none of our financial fears came to fruition.

A few days later, someone knocked on our door not long before bedtime, lightly as if not to offend. It was a young mother with a baby on her hip.

The baby coo-ed excitedly. The mother responded, "Yes, pumpkins," and pointed to the three sitting on our porch. Each year, my son asks us to buy three pumpkins to represent each of us. We set them on the front porch and decorate them (eventually).

The woman looked at me through the closed screen and said, "Um, do you have any clothes hangers I could have?"

The unusual request puzzled me, and I turned to my wife, who sat on the couch. "Do we have any extra clothes hangers?" I knew we did, but asking her gave me time to process.

The mother said, "If you don't have any, that's all right."

My wife went to our laundry alcove and grabbed a handful.

I handed them to the woman. She thanked me and left.

Normally, when something like that happens, I feel good. This did not feel like a good deed. I felt suspicious. It was just odd for some reason.

The next morning, my son whisper-shouted, "Our pumpkin is gone!"

Sure enough, one was missing. Not the biggest, but the most unique. It was the one my son picked out for me because it had a big wart on the side, and he thought I could make something funny out of that.

Did the mother steal it? Seems likely, but still circumstantial. I guess they needed it more than I did. . . . But they didn't take it from me. They took it from my son. This was just confusing, ethically. I'm not sure the lesson here.

The end of October involved a lot of Brillo pad sensations in the throat, fever, and gargling various home remedies for fighting infection.  I also inexplicably lost 38 lbs -- this was the precursor of something else happening.  More below.

The first week of November, I got sick again.  Cough-flu-wheezy-crud stuff.  It probably had something to do with having spring temperatures in November.  By November 7, I had lost 42 lbs.  I was neither dieting nor exercising.

By Nov 12, the flu-like symptoms started to break.

Nov 16, migraines became more frequent, and by Thanksgiving, they struck daily.  I was having trouble focusing my eyes. I attested this to eyestrain and getting older.

A couple days later, taking my morning medicines brought on intense heartburn and continued each day for two weeks. My doctor assured me that none of my meds caused heartburn.

Ongoing issues with my back, issues with anxiety and depression.

Dec 3, I started having pains in my legs. Internet research led me to think I probably had a blood clot. It was in both legs, however, which the Internet said was rare. Also, my feet were itching around the ankles. I noticed a slight rash.

Dec 4, the rash turned to what I thought were ulcers but were actually large blisters.

Dec 6, another migraine before I went to bed, which was 10 PM, and I didn't wake up until 10 AM -- 12 hours!  Most generally, I roll out around 7 or earlier.  Again, I attributed this to stress.  It is so easy to rationalize individual symptoms and ignore what they could mean collectively.

Dec 7, the apartment issue turned out to be a non-issue, which unloaded a mountain of stress from me.

Dec 8, my legs and feet were getting worse. At this point, a nurse friend of mine and I thought I probably had stasis dermatitis. Aspirins (as blood thinners) and ibuprofen and hydrocortisone helped . . . well, not at all.  Maybe it was fungal?  Anti-fungal medication did nothing.  That night, my right foot started turning blue.

Dec 9, the rash, which had merged into zombie-like sores and blisters, actually looked a little lighter in color.

Dec 12, I went to the doctor. She did not think all the pains in my hips and thighs and the rash was a blood clot. She said I had folliculitis that got infected.  Gave me antibiotics.

Dec 13, got word that doctors said my brother-in-law would likely pass away in a few days. He and I were not close, but he is the man who got me interested in reading. So, I owe him what I consider one of the foundational defining aspects of my life.   My sister asked me to write his eulogy, since I had done so for my dad almost six years ago.

Dec 17, at 5 AM, I started chilling.  It was just once for a short period, then it was over.  After daybreak, I got up and saw that I still had the rash. The antibiotics the doctor gave me did not seem to be working. I had decided that it was probably shingles, since it was starting to hurt. I couldn't even stand clothes touching it. Both feet had begun to swell -- seriously abnormal for me.  Then, mysteriously, at about 8:30 AM, the pain dropped to about 30% of what it was.  I called the doctor again and spoke with the nurse. She said they would have to review my chart and that they would call me back. 

At 2:24 PM, my niece messaged me that we lost my brother-in-law.

Dec 18, I woke up after sleeping 12 hours. Rash still hurt and itched like crazy. The sores looked bigger. Still thinking it was shingles, I thought maybe this meant they were flattening out and getting ready to crust over, which the Internet said was a sign of the ailment ending. By 10:30 that night, I could not walk. My wife took me to the ER. The physician seemed to think my problem was unusual, and she even called in a few coworkers to "take a look at this!"  They swabbed the blisters, took blood, and came back an hour or so later.  For the first time since 1976, I was admitted to the hospital.  One of the doctor's main concerns was tachycardic and that my blood sugar was 320.  I had no idea I was diabetic. They started an IV of medicines, one of which the nurse called, "The mother of all antibiotics."  I even got to experience what a shot of morphine was like.

The doctor came in the next morning and said, "Have you recently lost a lot of weight?"

My jaw dropped.  "Yes."  That explained the 38 lbs that fell off me inexplicably.

He asked, "Have you had blurry vision?"

"Yes."

"Frequent urination?"

"Yes"

"Thirsty?"

"Yes"

Every question was yes, yes, yes.

Finally, he said, "I don't need no A1C to tell me you're diabetic."

Over the next couple of days, my blood sugar slowly came down and the rash started to fade once they got the test came back that told them the correct dosage of vancomycin to give me. I was released in the early afternoon on Dec 21. 

I still have the rash.  Still have the infection.  Still am on antibiotics.  But I am getting better.  The diabetes is forcing me to eat better.  And, best of all, I have lost 52 lbs -- on purpose, now.



The Writing and Current Projects...

In October and November, I was still working on the Alaskan Fantasy novel, but I kept yearning to write a short story.

I did some content editing for my best friend, Yancy Caruther's, second novel.

Days and days and days and days passed with me waffling over whether or not to outline or discovery write:


Don't know whether this idea cluster thing is going to work out or not. For the last several days, I have been tempted to just start writing blind again. I can't see the story do anything but wander if I do that, though. . . .

I did a 5-minute writing sprint, and now Ch 3 is 318 words. That's the fastest I have written yet at 1,836 words per hour.

I think I am seeing something in outlining vs pantsing. With an outline, yes, my ideas are better, but they come VERY slowly. Why? Because I am constantly second guessing myself. "No, that's not good enough. How can the situation be worse? More interesting?" Obviously, a good plot needs these questions, but I am getting hung up on them.

With pantsing, I don't have time to do that second guessing. Maybe I should write at 1800 word per hour. If I wrote for 3 hours per day, my productivity would go through the roof, and if I wrote the same scene 3 times, I would probably see ideas of similar quality to the outline.

The problem is that it won't work that way. If I actually wrote for an hour, I'd be really jazzed to continue writing, but I would also be too close to the material to see how to truly improve it. I would need a couple of days.

Maybe I could take a week per chapter, though. That is stupid slow for the indie circuit, but it might not be bad for my first try. New Chapter Monday might not be a bad thing.


I tried a free month of Kindle Unlimited and read several books on writing -- and, to be honest, got my first taste of books that were not really ready for publication.

Even though I have nothing ready to publish yet, I wasted time wondering about traditional publishing vs. indie:


Many indies say there is absolutely no reason to go traditional. Trad publishers take all rights and you get a much thinner slice of the pie. True, but I don't see that it has hurt the NY Times bestsellers. That slice is like comparing a Generic Brand Pizza Roll to one of those monster wheels that restaurants take out of the oven on a ginormous boat oar.

I don't know, man. I love writing, but it is because I love it that I don't want to piss away whatever talent I may have forcing myself to hit quotas of 80K words a month. If I were 20 years old, instead of nearly 45, this decision would be much easier to make.


Then a friend told me, "It's not like this is a career plan, anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool." I don't take it well when someone shines the abyss in my face and, wrong or not, I was a little too aggressive in my response:

I don't have to get rich, but for me, it is a career plan. If the world's dilettantes want to call me a fool, so be it. These are the same people who vomit shit like "real job" and pontificate that trickle-down economics is the only American way and all poor people are poor because they are too stupid to manage their own money

Near the middle of November, I started experimenting with lots of timed writings, Pomodoro Techniques, etc. My efforts produced words, but I am not sure how much quality.  I kept remembering Dean Wesley Smith's blog posts about not writing sloppy first drafts.

In combination of the timer, I am using a modified Snowflake approach. The standard method is to write a sentence encompassing the entire story. Expand that one-liner into a paragraph. Break up the paragraph and expand each sentence into paragraphs. Those are essentially your chapter outlines.

Since my Stepping Stones chart worked so well yesterday, I am replacing the initial paragraph snowball with the chart. I take the chart as far as I can, meaning that when I get stuck I move to a different technique that takes me closer to manuscript. I look at clusters of boxes and circles that imply a beginning, middle, and end, and start turning those into a scene-sequel outline. Scenes and Sequels take the haphazard ideas from the Stepping Stones and add structure that creates continuity and suspense.

Next, I plan to move onto something that resembles a cross between a high school English class outline and a screenplay. This will help me nail dialogue and optimize scene organization.

Finally, will come manuscript.

That sounds like a lot of work. And it is. I am taking all the techniques that have worked on some level since I started writing, and I am combining them.

But it is not as complicated as I make it sound. Really all that is happening is that I am starting with a sketchy plot skeleton and continually filling in the gaps until it starts looking like a manuscript. One stage is not that much different than the next, except I think about each stage differently. Mixing up the approach keeps me on track and breaks the doldrums of routine.

It's an experiment. I don't see that my productivity has anywhere to go but up.

In the middle of November, I started hating the outline I had for my novel, which was only up to Chapter 3.  Around this same time, I became obsessed with increasing my productivity.  I experimented with voice dictation a little. This resulted in 100 words LESS per hour than typing -- and believe me, I'm not that fast a typist.

Nov 23, I converted what I had written of my novel into an epub file and uploaded it to my tablet. Wow! Did that ever make a difference in being able to see mistakes.

Nov 28, I spent failing to write on the novel because I was stressing out over issues with our apartment.

I am about >< this close to shelving the idea and going onto something new. Something where I can start with the hero having something to do other than look up and say, "Oh, that's big!"

I have been working on this idea for years. It is becoming an albatross.

I think I will. Maybe even switch genres for a while.

That evening . . . .

Well, my old dilemma is whether or not to outline. The writers I enjoy reading the most don't. However, when I try to wing it, I wander aimlessly.

This afternoon I began to wonder whether I could develop some sort of iterative drafting process. Essentially, it is simply writing several drafts to figure out the story, rather than outline. It would be slow as smoke off molasses but not any worse than never getting to the manuscript when you outline.

I think the difference this time will be that I now know that I need to quit concentrating on the language so much. It's better to be a good plot builder than be a good word smith. If you can do both, great, but if you can only pick one, tell a good story. . . .


It's the psychology of one process versus another. The old saying is "Writers are readers moved to emulation." Drafting without a net more closely mimics reading for enjoyment. Plotting/outline is more like planning a budget so you can go on a vacation.

One has a sense of wonder, the other a sense of responsibility.

Oh damn, I think the Tylenol is finally kicking in.

Only my right eye hurts now.

Dec 5, my friend Yancy drove from Missouri for a lesson in both Photoshop and designing book covers.  He did most of the work himself and did a surprisingly good job.

Dec 10, I finally shelved (perhaps not forever) the novel I had been working on.  I had been reading quite a few short stories recently, and the pull to write them was growing.

Christmas Day:  Ray Bradbury said something along the lines of "Write one story per week and do that for a year. Nobody writes fifty-two bad stories in a row."  So, I decided to do a little messing around with titles and eventually came up with "The Stranger from the Crater's Rim."  That sparked my imagination, and suddenly I was writing about a frail man climbing the side of a mesa. 

I'm thinking about taking on Bradbury's challenge of writing a story per week.  The story I started on Christmas Day was kind of a warm-up exercise.  To fulfill the requirements, I'd have to finish it by Dec 26, and I'm only half way done.  But, maybe it will take a few stories to gear up. 

Dec 31, By the way, the story has a different title now, which I won't reveal just yet.  For now, let's just call it LWL.


Happy New Year, everyone.